<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Roger&#039;s Information Security Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.infosecblog.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.infosecblog.org</link>
	<description>Since 2004, a source for ranting, reviews and InfoSec news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 20:26:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on DSc Information Assurance program at Capital College by Lio Fralop</title>
		<link>http://www.infosecblog.org/2011/01/dsc-information-assurance-program-at-capital-college/#comment-208302</link>
		<dc:creator>Lio Fralop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 20:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infosecblog.org/?p=5200#comment-208302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tell us what you think about Dakota State&#039;s doctorate program...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tell us what you think about Dakota State&#8217;s doctorate program&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SCUPing Adobe AIR by Louis M.</title>
		<link>http://www.infosecblog.org/2011/05/scuping-adobe-air/#comment-208227</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 14:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infosecblog.org/?p=5404#comment-208227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know this is an old blog and kind of necroing it, but this was VERY VERY helpful. Thank you!

Louis]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this is an old blog and kind of necroing it, but this was VERY VERY helpful. Thank you!</p>
<p>Louis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Adobe Reader update by Gina</title>
		<link>http://www.infosecblog.org/2009/10/adobe-reader-update/#comment-208214</link>
		<dc:creator>Gina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 17:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infosecblog.org/2009/10/adobe-reader-update/#comment-208214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi there, I enjoy reading through your article.
I like to write a little comment to support 
you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there, I enjoy reading through your article.<br />
I like to write a little comment to support<br />
you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Varonis Eval by Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.infosecblog.org/2011/06/5464/#comment-208197</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Mar 2013 18:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infosecblog.org/?p=5464#comment-208197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Varonis product line worked decently well for us in the past, however Microsoft&#039;s 2012 line has rendered it useless. All the functionality offered by their software is built-in and in my view is easier to use. Server 2012 is a bear to tackle with it&#039;s enourmous feature set but is well worth the time investment to learn. It&#039;s an excellent product that fills many of the gaps that this and many other 3rd party tools were once useful for.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Varonis product line worked decently well for us in the past, however Microsoft&#8217;s 2012 line has rendered it useless. All the functionality offered by their software is built-in and in my view is easier to use. Server 2012 is a bear to tackle with it&#8217;s enourmous feature set but is well worth the time investment to learn. It&#8217;s an excellent product that fills many of the gaps that this and many other 3rd party tools were once useful for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on University of Fairfax by Insider</title>
		<link>http://www.infosecblog.org/2006/03/university-of-fairfax/#comment-208193</link>
		<dc:creator>Insider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 19:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infosecblog.org/2006/03/university-of-fairfax/#comment-208193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[University of Fairfax is a fully accredited institution and was recently purchased by National College (AKA American National University) with home offices in Salem, VA as well as Roanoke, VA.  This college also have more than 30 campuses in five different states.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>University of Fairfax is a fully accredited institution and was recently purchased by National College (AKA American National University) with home offices in Salem, VA as well as Roanoke, VA.  This college also have more than 30 campuses in five different states.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on GuardianEdge Removable Storage Encryption by Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.infosecblog.org/2010/10/guardianedge-removable-storage-encryption/#comment-208184</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 11:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infosecblog.org/?p=5080#comment-208184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a problem with getting BSOD using Guardian Edge 9.4.1 on a USB drive on Windows XP.  When I try to copy large number of files to the USB drive, Guardian Edge crashes the system.  On the other hand if I compress the files into one zip file, it appears that no matter how big the resulting file, there is than no problem copying it to the USB drive.  I&#039;ve asked our sys admins and there response is essentialy to bad, live with it.  Has any one had a similar problem and know of a way to make Guardian edge behave?  The Sys admins tell me it just keeps grabbing more memory until it crashes the OS.  Is there anyway to limit the amount of system resource guardian Edge grabs.  We should be migrating to Windows 7 in next few months.  Has anyone heard of this being a windows 7 problem also?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a problem with getting BSOD using Guardian Edge 9.4.1 on a USB drive on Windows XP.  When I try to copy large number of files to the USB drive, Guardian Edge crashes the system.  On the other hand if I compress the files into one zip file, it appears that no matter how big the resulting file, there is than no problem copying it to the USB drive.  I&#8217;ve asked our sys admins and there response is essentialy to bad, live with it.  Has any one had a similar problem and know of a way to make Guardian edge behave?  The Sys admins tell me it just keeps grabbing more memory until it crashes the OS.  Is there anyway to limit the amount of system resource guardian Edge grabs.  We should be migrating to Windows 7 in next few months.  Has anyone heard of this being a windows 7 problem also?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on GSE Multiple Choice Exam by Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.infosecblog.org/2011/01/gse-multiple-choice-exam/#comment-208180</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 21:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infosecblog.org/?p=5179#comment-208180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[given this was posted with a fake address, I&#039;m going to assume that you aren&#039;t real and didn&#039;t want a response.  If you are real, ask using the content form.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>given this was posted with a fake address, I&#8217;m going to assume that you aren&#8217;t real and didn&#8217;t want a response.  If you are real, ask using the content form.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on GSE Multiple Choice Exam by Trevor</title>
		<link>http://www.infosecblog.org/2011/01/gse-multiple-choice-exam/#comment-208178</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 00:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infosecblog.org/?p=5179#comment-208178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do you mind if I quote a small number of your blog posts as 
long as I provide credit and sources returning to your site:
http://www.infosecblog.org/2011/01/gse-multiple-choice-exam/.
I most certainly will aslo be sure to give you the 
proper anchortext link using your blog title: GSE Multiple Choice 
Exam &#124; Roger&#039;s Information Security Blog. Please be sure to let me know if this is okay with you. Many thanks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you mind if I quote a small number of your blog posts as<br />
long as I provide credit and sources returning to your site:<br />
<a href="http://www.infosecblog.org/2011/01/gse-multiple-choice-exam/" rel="nofollow">http://www.infosecblog.org/2011/01/gse-multiple-choice-exam/</a>.<br />
I most certainly will aslo be sure to give you the<br />
proper anchortext link using your blog title: GSE Multiple Choice<br />
Exam | Roger&#8217;s Information Security Blog. Please be sure to let me know if this is okay with you. Many thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ad Blocking and the Enterprise by Igor Aguryanov</title>
		<link>http://www.infosecblog.org/2010/10/ad-blocking-and-the-enterprise/#comment-208142</link>
		<dc:creator>Igor Aguryanov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 14:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infosecblog.org/?p=5049#comment-208142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Is an ad-bock company wide different from an individual installing advertisement filtering software?&quot;

Yes. People who block ads do not click ads anyway, and as long as adblock is opt-in, this will never, ever be a problem.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Is an ad-bock company wide different from an individual installing advertisement filtering software?&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes. People who block ads do not click ads anyway, and as long as adblock is opt-in, this will never, ever be a problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Self Encrypting Drives by Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.infosecblog.org/2013/01/self-encrypting-drives/#comment-208131</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 04:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infosecblog.org/?p=6189#comment-208131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I ran across Sophos&#039; support list for SED.
http://www.sophos.com/en-us/support/knowledgebase/113366.aspx
&quot;In general, SafeGuard Device Encryption as of version 5.60 supports all drives (HDD/SSD) that follow the OPAL specification. &quot;
They then list devices they have specifically tested that work, and deviced that have been found not to work.
That is the approach I would expect from a SED management platform.

I also found Wave&#039;s compatibility list for SED.
http://www.wave.com/self-encrypting-drive-compatibility-list
This is a long list of drives that have been tested and proven compatible with Wave.
Only a few drives are marked as FIPS 140-2 compliant.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I ran across Sophos&#8217; support list for SED.<br />
<a href="http://www.sophos.com/en-us/support/knowledgebase/113366.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.sophos.com/en-us/support/knowledgebase/113366.aspx</a><br />
&#8220;In general, SafeGuard Device Encryption as of version 5.60 supports all drives (HDD/SSD) that follow the OPAL specification. &#8221;<br />
They then list devices they have specifically tested that work, and deviced that have been found not to work.<br />
That is the approach I would expect from a SED management platform.</p>
<p>I also found Wave&#8217;s compatibility list for SED.<br />
<a href="http://www.wave.com/self-encrypting-drive-compatibility-list" rel="nofollow">http://www.wave.com/self-encrypting-drive-compatibility-list</a><br />
This is a long list of drives that have been tested and proven compatible with Wave.<br />
Only a few drives are marked as FIPS 140-2 compliant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
