Just when you thought you’d successfully killed it off, its back. The email from management who is getting pressure from the c levels asking why the iPhone isn’t supported. It comes in on schedule every two month.
“iPhone version 3.1 has solved all the security problems, right?”
Um, no.
“There is now a Wolfram Alpha app for the iPhone. This would really help our business development”
Are you serious?
Who can blame them. Apple and their willing co-conspirators in the tech media have been repeating the mantra. “iPhone 3GS is secure for the enterprise.” Secure or not companies are adopting the iPhone, even to the point of allowing personal devices. Lets summarize what we know and what we dont know about the
Problem 1: Encryption
It is of critical importance to protect data privacy through encryption. iphoneinsecurity.com, a site dedicated to iphone forensics has posted video demonstrating the bypass of the iPhone 3GS encryption.
I suppose some would argue that the evil maid attack allows bypass of Full Disk Encryption on computers so I shouldn’t have my data there either. Of course using a smart card or bitlocker with TPM I could protect myself from this attack.
Problem 2: passcode bypass
The passcode on a iPhone is bypassable
Problem 3: Lack of Central Config Management
Enterprises are used to controlling phone configuration centrally a la through a Blackberry Enterprise Server. iPhones configuration is sort of voluntary. TrustDigital would say they solve that issue. I need to talk with them (again) because I think they can enforce a configuration at the time the iPhone connects to the server, but I dont think they have a permanent enforcement agent. Could be wrong.
Problem 4: patching
While patches can be pushed from the BES, iPhone users need to install each patch individually through iTunes
Problem 5: iTunes
Speaking of iTunes, that isn’t exactly a corporate type product. What if we dont want that on our computers. RIM has worked to make Blackberry work without installing any desktop software in a BES environment.
Problem 6: App Store
Whose account is used in iTunes? Do they use their personal account? In that case the end user really owns any applications purchased by the corporation on that account. When the employee terminates they would essentially walk out with the applications the company owns. If a corporate account is created then the opposite problem occurs.
Problem 7: Jailbroken phones
Jailbroken phones are susceptible to security problems. Besides the ikee worm, they allow unapproved applications to be run, bypassing Apple’s whitelisting security model. How can an enterprise prevent jail broken phones from being used?
Problem 8: Repeaters
Like a lot of company headquarters, ours is like a unintentional Faraday Cage. We’ve had to put up repeaters for Verizon and Nextel. Are we supposed to pony up and install AT&T repeaters?
While the iPhone remains exceedingly popular, it still has Apple’s consumer mindset at the core. (sorry bad pun) At least at our company I dont see it making headway until the encryption issue is solved. Then I’ll talk with TrustDigital again about their management solution.
update
The day I posted this I got emailed an announcement of Good Technology’s support for the iPhone. Good uses their own application and would keep the corporate email encrypted in that. However any other corporate data that made its way on to there wouldn’t be protected. In an era of cutbacks its hard to provide support for both Good and Blackberry.
Commenters have pointed out that the iPhone still does not support S/MIME or PGP. I had thought to check on that but it didn’t make the article. S/MIME support is mandatory for my company.
Archive for November 2009
iPhone (in)security in the enterprise
Real or False Positive
Moments ago I received a virus alert for Downloader.SWF.Agent.bv on a user’s web request.
Referer: http://www.real.com/player/index.html
Destination: http://ke-el.com/download/checkout_confirmation.php?s=ZJxmRSLB&id=3
That either means the user clicked on a link on real.com that took them to a virus page or the virus page is a element of the real.com page. Either way not good. I went to the real.com page and didn’t see any funny business. It would be a good story if Real.com was infected. I think it had to be for my user to get this result, but I couldn’t spot the trouble myself.
Next I checked out the ke-el site. Scansafe detected that page as Gumblar.x. I opened the page up using a online HTTP viewer and say the following
Security Updates for Shockwave
Adobe has released Adobe Shockwave 11.5.2.602 to fix multiple security vulnerabilities.
You can install this version at http://get.adobe.com/shockwave/. if you’ve taken the time to license Shockwave for redistribution in your company, the MSI file isn’t available on the licensed distribution site.
Kaspkersky False Positive in gosearch.gif
Kaspersky is detecting gosearch.gif as Trojan.JS.ramif.a.
gosearch.gif is a standard magnifying glass icon used in Sharepoint as a search button.
I submitted this to Kaspersky and they concur its a false positive, so hopefully updated defs will be out shortly.

