<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Symantec Dameware False Positive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.infosecblog.org/2009/09/symantec-dameware-false-positive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.infosecblog.org/2009/09/symantec-dameware-false-positive/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 07:04:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Demonen</title>
		<link>http://www.infosecblog.org/2009/09/symantec-dameware-false-positive/comment-page-1/#comment-381</link>
		<dc:creator>Demonen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infosecblog.org/2009/09/symantec-dameware-false-positive/#comment-381</guid>
		<description>I work for a huge OEM, and we ship a lot of software with our unit, especially for the end-user market.
Every few months we are hit by some sort of False Positive like this, and it generates support calls like you would not believe.
D&#039;you think Symantec (or whatever AV vendor) pics up that tab?  Me neither.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I work for a huge OEM, and we ship a lot of software with our unit, especially for the end-user market.<br />
Every few months we are hit by some sort of False Positive like this, and it generates support calls like you would not believe.<br />
D&#8217;you think Symantec (or whatever AV vendor) pics up that tab?  Me neither.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Penetration Test</title>
		<link>http://www.infosecblog.org/2009/09/symantec-dameware-false-positive/comment-page-1/#comment-380</link>
		<dc:creator>Penetration Test</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 05:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infosecblog.org/2009/09/symantec-dameware-false-positive/#comment-380</guid>
		<description>I have seen other remote administration tools detected previously as &quot;hacker tools&quot; or similar. e.g. psexec. How does an AV vendor decide which tools to include/ignore? It seems many tools can potentially be used for different purposes. Obviously doesn&#039;t make the vendor of the included tool happy.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have seen other remote administration tools detected previously as &#8220;hacker tools&#8221; or similar. e.g. psexec. How does an AV vendor decide which tools to include/ignore? It seems many tools can potentially be used for different purposes. Obviously doesn&#8217;t make the vendor of the included tool happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Irvin</title>
		<link>http://www.infosecblog.org/2009/09/symantec-dameware-false-positive/comment-page-1/#comment-379</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Irvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infosecblog.org/2009/09/symantec-dameware-false-positive/#comment-379</guid>
		<description>I noticed this yesterday, they had a problem with the Firefox installer earlier in the week also.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed this yesterday, they had a problem with the Firefox installer earlier in the week also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

