<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Symantec IM Manager and AOL SSL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.infosecblog.org/2008/07/symantec-im-manager-and-aol-ssl/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.infosecblog.org/2008/07/symantec-im-manager-and-aol-ssl/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 07:04:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John D</title>
		<link>http://www.infosecblog.org/2008/07/symantec-im-manager-and-aol-ssl/comment-page-1/#comment-277</link>
		<dc:creator>John D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 16:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infosecblog.org/2008/07/symantec-im-manager-and-aol-ssl/#comment-277</guid>
		<description>&quot;While users are advised that this is our network and our computers, might they argue that they have a reasonable expectation of privacy since AIM is using SSL?&quot;
As long as the users are made aware of any responsible/appropriate use of computing resources policy (which specifies monitoring), then they should not expect any privacy while chatting.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;While users are advised that this is our network and our computers, might they argue that they have a reasonable expectation of privacy since AIM is using SSL?&#8221;<br />
As long as the users are made aware of any responsible/appropriate use of computing resources policy (which specifies monitoring), then they should not expect any privacy while chatting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

