http://www.infosecblog.org/2008/02/shmoocon-2008-day-1/ Mon, 06 Feb 2012 07:04:18 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.infosecblog.org/2008/02/shmoocon-2008-day-1/comment-page-1/#comment-236 Roger Sat, 16 Feb 2008 23:21:51 +0000 http://www.infosecblog.org/2008/02/shmoocon-2008-day-1/#comment-236 sorry about that I'll correct that above. Obviously I made a bad assumption. I was at one of the other talks during the "forced internet condom" talk. Personally I kind of like ma and pa kettle not having netbios ports open. They shouldn't be able to send mail over port 25 either. If/when the video is posted, I'll check that out to get the opposing opinion. sorry about that I’ll correct that above. Obviously I made a bad assumption.
I was at one of the other talks during the “forced internet condom” talk. Personally I kind of like ma and pa kettle not having netbios ports open. They shouldn’t be able to send mail over port 25 either. If/when the video is posted, I’ll check that out to get the opposing opinion.

]]> http://www.infosecblog.org/2008/02/shmoocon-2008-day-1/comment-page-1/#comment-235 Rohyt Belani Sat, 16 Feb 2008 12:23:37 +0000 http://www.infosecblog.org/2008/02/shmoocon-2008-day-1/#comment-235 Correction: Syn Phishus has NO association with PhishMe.com. BTW if you want to meet the PhishMe guys someof us are speaking "Forced Internet Condom" and the rest uhh just listening Correction: Syn Phishus has NO association with PhishMe.com.
BTW if you want to meet the PhishMe guys someof us are speaking “Forced Internet Condom” and the rest uhh just listening

]]>