<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Auditors and Company Policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.infosecblog.org/2007/09/auditors-and-company-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.infosecblog.org/2007/09/auditors-and-company-policy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 07:04:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Auditors and Company Policy, Part 2 - Roger&#039;s Information Security Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.infosecblog.org/2007/09/auditors-and-company-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-13459</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Auditors and Company Policy, Part 2 - Roger&#039;s Information Security Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 23:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infosecblog.org/2007/09/auditors-and-company-policy/#comment-13459</guid>
		<description>[...] Policy, Part 2 August 31, 2010, 7:30 pm   Back in 2007 I posted a blog entry about catching our auditors violating company policy by putting their company&#8217;s computer on our network.   Today, new group of FISMA auditors, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Policy, Part 2 August 31, 2010, 7:30 pm   Back in 2007 I posted a blog entry about catching our auditors violating company policy by putting their company&#8217;s computer on our network.   Today, new group of FISMA auditors, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.infosecblog.org/2007/09/auditors-and-company-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 01:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infosecblog.org/2007/09/auditors-and-company-policy/#comment-194</guid>
		<description>Thanks for commenting.
That is currently not determined.  I&#039;ll probably keep that detail under wraps.
Just speculating, I doubt there is anything in the contract about that.  All we can do is complain to their company and ask for compensation.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for commenting.<br />
That is currently not determined.  I&#8217;ll probably keep that detail under wraps.<br />
Just speculating, I doubt there is anything in the contract about that.  All we can do is complain to their company and ask for compensation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kees.leune.myopenid.com</title>
		<link>http://www.infosecblog.org/2007/09/auditors-and-company-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>kees.leune.myopenid.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 19:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infosecblog.org/2007/09/auditors-and-company-policy/#comment-193</guid>
		<description>What I am interested in: these auditors willingly and knowingly violated your company&#039;s policy. Was any action taken against the auditors? At the very least, I would think there has to be some form of compensation.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I am interested in: these auditors willingly and knowingly violated your company&#8217;s policy. Was any action taken against the auditors? At the very least, I would think there has to be some form of compensation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

